D. pseudoobscura (EPS vs PS)
I performed differential expression analysis by comparing cells in the EPS cluster with cells in PS1, PS2, and PS3. I then took the list of genes from this analysis (EPS-biased, PS-biased, Not Significant) and filtered out the orthologs. The number of genes analyzed per Muller element and class are in Table 1.
Table 1. Number of genes per Muller Element.
muller_A | muller_D | muller_E | |
---|---|---|---|
conserved | 54 | 114 | 177 |
recent_conserved | 0 | 0 | 0 |
moved_on | 7 | 1 | 3 |
gene_death | 34 | 20 | 24 |
moved_off | 3 | 8 | 6 |
other | 14 | 34 | 29 |
PS Expression
In Figures 1-3 I look at the proportion of PS1, PS2, and P3 cells that expressed genes in the different movement classes. The number of genes in the moved_on and moved_off classes are very low (< 10) which makes interpretation difficult. I group genes into “Selection Favor” and “Selection Against” for all statistical analyses. Here I compare the distribution of the proportion of cells using a Mann-Whitney U test. We see an significant increase in PS expression for genes with “Selection Against” on all Muller elements. However, the number of genes in the two classes is very different so I am worried about biases.
Mann-Whitney U (Favor vs Against): 0.00014820920368461394
Figure 1. Gene movement on/off of Muller element A.
Mann-Whitney U (Favor vs Against): 4.247933807388154e-20
Figure 2. Gene movement on/off of Muller element D.
Mann-Whitney U (Favor vs Against): 4.278607873507591e-40
Figure 3. Gene movement on/off of Muller element E.
Enrichment of PS Biased Genes
Next, we looked at contingency tables to test for a relationship between PS1, PS2, and PS3 biased expression and selection against. Again, cell counts are very low for some combinations (Table 2,4,6) so I combined counts to make statistical analysis possible (Table 3,5,7). There is evidence of a enrichment of genes that underwent “Selection Against” for Muller elements D and E.
Table 2. Number of genes with differential expression on Muller A.
bias | conserved | moved_on | gene_death | moved_off |
---|---|---|---|---|
NS | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
PS | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
EPS | 50 | 3 | 27 | 2 |
Table 3. Number of genes with selection on Muller A.
bias | Selection Favor | Selection Against |
---|---|---|
PS Biased | 4 | 4 |
Not Biased | 57 | 33 |
Fisher’s Exact Test: 0.47126741340750544
Table 4. Number of genes with differential expression on Muller D.
bias | conserved | moved_on | gene_death | moved_off |
---|---|---|---|---|
NS | 9 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
PS | 23 | 1 | 8 | 6 |
EPS | 82 | 0 | 7 | 2 |
Table 5. Number of genes with selection on Muller D.
bias | Selection Favor | Selection Against |
---|---|---|
PS Biased | 24 | 14 |
Not Biased | 91 | 14 |
Fisher’s Exact Test: 0.0034996761816397386
Table 6. Number of genes with differential expression on Muller E.
bias | conserved | moved_on | gene_death | moved_off |
---|---|---|---|---|
NS | 19 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
PS | 42 | 2 | 15 | 1 |
EPS | 116 | 1 | 7 | 2 |
Table 7. Number of genes with selection on Muller E.
bias | Selection Favor | Selection Against |
---|---|---|
PS Biased | 44 | 16 |
Not Biased | 136 | 14 |
Fisher’s Exact Test: 0.0020621301227712065