D. Pseudoobscura (EPS vs PS)

D. pseudoobscura (EPS vs PS)

I performed differential expression analysis by comparing cells in the EPS cluster with cells in PS1, PS2, and PS3. I then took the list of genes from this analysis (EPS-biased, PS-biased, Not Significant) and filtered out the orthologs. The number of genes analyzed per Muller element and class are in Table 1.

Table 1. Number of genes per Muller Element.

muller_Amuller_Dmuller_E
conserved54114177
recent_conserved000
moved_on713
gene_death342024
moved_off386
other143429

PS Expression

In Figures 1-3 I look at the proportion of PS1, PS2, and P3 cells that expressed genes in the different movement classes. The number of genes in the moved_on and moved_off classes are very low (< 10) which makes interpretation difficult. I group genes into “Selection Favor” and “Selection Against” for all statistical analyses. Here I compare the distribution of the proportion of cells using a Mann-Whitney U test. We see an significant increase in PS expression for genes with “Selection Against” on all Muller elements. However, the number of genes in the two classes is very different so I am worried about biases.

Mann-Whitney U (Favor vs Against): 0.00014820920368461394

Figure 1. Gene movement on/off of Muller element A.

Figure 1. Gene movement on/off of Muller element A.

Mann-Whitney U (Favor vs Against): 4.247933807388154e-20

Figure 2. Gene movement on/off of Muller element D.

Figure 2. Gene movement on/off of Muller element D.

Mann-Whitney U (Favor vs Against): 4.278607873507591e-40

Figure 3. Gene movement on/off of Muller element E.

Figure 3. Gene movement on/off of Muller element E.

Enrichment of PS Biased Genes

Next, we looked at contingency tables to test for a relationship between PS1, PS2, and PS3 biased expression and selection against. Again, cell counts are very low for some combinations (Table 2,4,6) so I combined counts to make statistical analysis possible (Table 3,5,7). There is evidence of a enrichment of genes that underwent “Selection Against” for Muller elements D and E.

Table 2. Number of genes with differential expression on Muller A.

biasconservedmoved_ongene_deathmoved_off
NS4031
PS0440
EPS503272

Table 3. Number of genes with selection on Muller A.

biasSelection FavorSelection Against
PS Biased44
Not Biased5733

Fisher’s Exact Test: 0.47126741340750544

Table 4. Number of genes with differential expression on Muller D.

biasconservedmoved_ongene_deathmoved_off
NS9050
PS23186
EPS82072

Table 5. Number of genes with selection on Muller D.

biasSelection FavorSelection Against
PS Biased2414
Not Biased9114

Fisher’s Exact Test: 0.0034996761816397386

Table 6. Number of genes with differential expression on Muller E.

biasconservedmoved_ongene_deathmoved_off
NS19023
PS422151
EPS116172

Table 7. Number of genes with selection on Muller E.

biasSelection FavorSelection Against
PS Biased4416
Not Biased13614

Fisher’s Exact Test: 0.0020621301227712065